The comparison, in one table
HEDAMO vs Traceability
Why this matters
Per stakeholder
- Buyer
- Traceability data answers logistics questions. Disclosure data answers product questions (variety, practices, claims, evidence) that procurement and risk teams need before any logistics question becomes relevant.
- Government
- Regulators receive traceability records but rarely the structured product disclosure that would let them assess what was actually declared. Disclosure makes the producer-declared layer legible without taking over the admissibility decision.
- Trade body
- A trade association can describe what producer-level information should travel with a product category. Disclosure is the structure that lets that description be implemented at the product level, with gaps marked rather than hidden.
- Researcher
- Disclosure schemas with declared gaps make a product comparable across studies, including the absence of information, which is itself research-useful.
Boundary
HEDAMO does not replace traceability, certification, labelling, or compliance. It carries the product-level disclosure layer that those systems were not built to carry. Producers own their declarations. Jurisdictions determine admissibility. HEDAMO structures.
Research basis
SGPIS-GQ-02 examines the structural gap between traceability records (movement data) and product-level disclosure across six jurisdictions and two global standards.
Live example